Here's something else directed to the "no such thing as bad publicity" or the "i thought we were allowed freedom of speech" crowd. First off: There is such a thing as bad publicity. Look around adland and you'll find examples in social media where clients had to apologize for their bad publicity, inadvertent or otherwise.
Secondly, freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from criticism. She's lucky she was even heard. Despite what many Europeans may think opinions like that in the U.S.A. would either be shouted out completely, or they wouldn't get the time of day to begin with.
In sweden apparently they are made representatives of the country. WITHOUT repercussions or apologies form said country.
And that's the thing her defenders seem to be forgetting. Her opinions may be her own but she is REPRESENTING SWEDEN in this case. IMO, Sweden should apologize for her behavior. It would be more heartfelt than if she did.
But instead we'll hide behind ignorance or the old freedom of speech or 'it's just a joke.' No, it isn't a joke. A lot of Jews and Poles and Hungarians and Sweden's neighboring countrymen in Norway and Denmark died. It isn't funny. And the country of Sweden should realize she is damaging to their reputation and do something about it, rather than ignore it.
The other thing about pleading ignorance-- there's something called google. And wikipedia. If you don't know something about someone's faith, and you want to know something about it, then research it.
End Rant.
I am a luddite and prefer cordless phones over anything else.
That being said I am putting myself in the mindset of a consumer as opposed to an advertising navel gazer. Most consumers aren't going to give "episode 2" another go if the first one was boring. If I don't like The New Girl starring Zooey Deschanel, I'm not going to keep watching it.
As for whether the Absolut Movie was successful as branded entertainment, define "successful." And Zach Galifianakis isn't a perfect comparison because a. it's booze, and b. this is mobile phones.
Spekaing of branded entertainment, If you know your TV history then you've no doubt heard of Texaco Star Theater which was the original 'branded entertainment model."
While they did show a thirty second jingle commercial during the show, and the name was branded Texaco (like Absolut movie) it was a variety show that had nothing to do with gasoline. Episodes didn't center around gasoline usage. No product demos. People weren't talking about gasoline. You know why? because in the branded entertainment name, the entertainment came first. Not product placement.
Was it successful branded entertainment? Well, considering it was on air from 1948-1956 and every night millions of people heard the word "Texaco," I'm gonna go with yes. Will Daybreak be successful enough to get millions of people playing with their phones and ipads and computers simultaneously? I'm gonna go with no.
What I really want to know is, how come no one is pointing out that the hashtag was created by a journalist for the National Post? Making fun of Labatt Blue, in the wake of one of canada's most grizzly crimes in a very long while. Is this really proper behavior for a journalist?
Dear blank please blank:
You do realize this meme has a shorter shelf life than tuna fish left in
a car's trunk in August?
Sincerely, just checking.
Here's an Ad one:
Dear account people:
Last time I checked, the agency pays your salary. Not the client.
Sincerely, every creative department in the world.
There are currently 0 users online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser