If you actually READ the article it never said it was paid for by the Obama administration. It is indeed though a Pro-Obama ad. How do we know? Well, if you go to Future Children Project's website it clearly reads: "Re-Electing President Obama Is A Momentous Decision That Will Require Every Single Voter. What Would The Children Of The Future Say If We Let Them Down This November?"
It's hardly cheap innuendo if the CREATORS have stated the purpose of the ad, is it?
Except on TLC and Bravo, where the weddings are elaborate, and apparently only on TV. Granted there's only one incumbent but his entire "support" of gay marriage has basically been nothing more than to say "my opinion is evolving."
Everything about this rubs me the wrong way. She should be ashamed of herself and so should the Obama administration for pandering to first time voters in such a condescending, moth-eaten way. Understand I don't even care about the politics, I'm just talking purely from an ad standpoint. One year the guy gives us hope and change which was at least timely and original, and this time he makes a losing my virginity joke?
Feeble.
There are currently 3 users online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser
Clicking on it would indeed lead you to buy batteries. But I was thinking more about it being akin to watching a commercial or print ad in a relevant context. I kinda meant it like that.
- reply
Permalink