How to create bad PR - get a marketing boss who knows nothing about the web and have him surf it.
The fan-site https://colapriser.dk/ used to be called cocacolapriser.dk (Coca-cola prices.dk) before Coca Cola made them change their URL. André Lund who owns the site obliged. Now their name (colapriser.dk) is akin to saying "sodaprices.dk". Still this didn't seem to be enough for Coke, who sent an email stating:
..one more thing remains. If you are to be allowed to link to a coca cola website (cocacola.dk) you have to send in a written application to us. I can not see that you have made such an application, and there is no agreement with you about this. So I have to ask you to remove the link to www.cocacola.dk.(emphasis mine)
After Metro Paper shone a light on the story, Coke's tone changed quite dramatically. Politiken writes that they have sent apologies:
We're sorry if this was interpreted as a threat. That was not our intention.wrote Kenth Kærhøg on Coke's own homepage, but it looks like this has been removed since.
Whomever sent that email about the link, identifying themselves as someone who "works with our brands", should probably find a more suitable career.
Hat tip to Mikker.
ridiculous.
talk about a waste of time for all involved to be disputing over such a trivial matter.
- reply
PermalinkBTW - om något helt annat Åsk.
Jag hoppas du har läst
http://sydsvenskan.se/nojen/article109123.ece
sug i dig :)
Annica Tiger
http://www.tiger.se/blog/
- reply
PermalinkFast Co had sort of the same non-linkin' policy if i remember right.
- reply
PermalinkThey did? Mad! I know that there's a site called http://dontlink.com/ which back in 2002 used to keep track of all the mad "don't link to us" policy by, wait for it..., linking to them. ;) hehehe.
Ps - Tack Annica. :)
- reply
PermalinkJepps. And since you know the lingua of the brave and beautiful you can check my post about it at Researcher :)
- reply
Permalink