Nike Gets Bit

It's a minute long. Less than a second of it has two dogs on leashes - a pit bull and a rottweiler - doing what dogs sometimes do. "Heavens to Betsy!," exclaimed some. "They're glorifying dog fighting!" And poof... it's pooched.

Go here for the story, and if you're a superadgrunt, go here for the spot. From what I can see, the dogs do the snarly lunge thing, but are pulled back by the handlers, which to me sends out the message that they're keeping the dogs from fighting, not glorifying it. It fits in great with the spot and the music too, dang it.

 

Created by local advertising agency Wieden & Kennedy, the commercial promoted Beaverton-based Nike's newest basketball shoe, the Air Zoom Ultraflight, which retails for $125.

When the ad aired in mid-February, the local Humane Society received about 20 complaints about it many from vexed individuals contending the ad glorified dog fighting.

"It was never Nike's intent to associate with, imply, or encourage dog fighting in any way," read the letter from Nike to the Humane Society.

In February, the nonprofit agency sent Nike a letter airing concerns about the commercial, and noting the complaints.

Other grievances about the commericial came from the Bay area. The group Bay Area Doglovers Responsible About Pit Bulls (BADRAP) posted a heated article about the ad on its web site. The dogs featured in the commercial were a pit bull and a rottweiler.

"We will ensure the clip in question will not appear in the remaining ads ... Also, we will stop running the ad in question as of March 17, 2003," said the Nike letter, written by company spokeswoman Celeste Allenye.

src="adland.tv/ike-hoops-aka-battle-long-2003-060-usa">go here for the spot. From what I can see, the dogs do the snarly lunge thing, but are pulled back by the handlers, which to me sends out the message that they're keeping the dogs from fighting, not glorifying it. It fits in great with the spot and the music too, dang it.

 

Created by local advertising agency Wieden & Kennedy, the commercial promoted Beaverton-based Nike's newest basketball shoe, the Air Zoom Ultraflight, which retails for $125.

When the ad aired in mid-February, the local Humane Society received about 20 complaints about it many from vexed individuals contending the ad glorified dog fighting.

"It was never Nike's intent to associate with, imply, or encourage dog fighting in any way," read the letter from Nike to the Humane Society.

In February, the nonprofit agency sent Nike a letter airing concerns about the commercial, and noting the complaints.

Other grievances about the commericial came from the Bay area. The group Bay Area Doglovers Responsible About Pit Bulls (BADRAP) posted a heated article about the ad on its web site. The dogs featured in the commercial were a pit bull and a rottweiler.

"We will ensure the clip in question will not appear in the remaining ads ... Also, we will stop running the ad in question as of March 17, 2003," said the Nike letter, written by company spokeswoman Celeste Allenye.

Adland® is supported by your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi coffee.
Anonymous Adgrunt's picture
comment_node_story
Files must be less than 5 MB.
Allowed file types: jpg jpeg gif png wav avi mpeg mpg mov rm flv wmv 3gp mp4 m4v.
blabla's picture

grrROOOOWL!

Twenty people? Thats all it takes? 20 people complain and a fantastic commercial is yanked off the air?

I'll leave you to think about how many protested the war and the non-results of that one.

What does all of this mean?

Dabitch's picture

I blinked and missed it. Seriously. I did.
Where the hell were the dogs in this commercial?

Did those who complained record and track through the commercial frame by frame?

claymore's picture

LOL

It's between 0:49 and 0:50, roughly ;-)

AnonymousCoward's picture

god. if i pulled my commercials after 20 complaints, i'd have nothing on the air.

tlevitz's picture

Am I being paranoid or is something going on here? Are more and more spots being yanked, or threatened with being yanked?

TiVo may actually be the salvation of our industry (although the chronic complainers usually aren't satisfied with making their own choices in their own homes).

I'm not sure how I feel about the content this spot (probably 'cause I just read some disturbing stuff about inner-city dog fighting) but technically speaking, yeah, it's good. One that deserves to spark conversation (as they all should) not the villagers out in force with their flaming pitchforks.

blabla's picture

The apologies for ads began in 2003, who knew.